@log4j 10/23
banned for reverse engineering work? that’s wild
oh well, -$500, and a bunch of banked resets) but gained motivation to get 3 more machines and finish my cluster.
i have never used openai to exploit or find vulnerabilities, only local reverse engineering which tripped daybreak.

@boneGPT 10/25
imagine a fully integrated AI future where being banned means you are now economically useless. everybody around you is a superhuman living in the future but you violated TOS and now are cut off.
your smart glasses that showed you a beautiful utopia? the color has left them. you are forced to live in a bleak gray world. you are forced to look your wife in her actual face and she is not happy with you.
you are digging holes with a spoon while everybody else is building skyscrapers with an army of bots.
this is the real doomer catastrophe
open source is the only way to protect your freedom, your economic viability & your ability to tell these companies to fuck right off.
a few months ago openAI and anthropic were desperately begging the admin to make it legal for them to collaborate. if they got their way, one TOS violation on either platform would send you directly to the sunken place.

Twitter 用户 @log4j（应该与 Java 日志库 Apache Log4j 没有关系）发文称，自己因为从事逆向工程工作，OpenAI 账号遭到封禁，损失了 500 美元以及大量积攒的额度。由于不再依赖商业 AI 平台，他决定再购买三台机器，自己搭建 AI 集群。

另一位 Twitter 用户 @boneGPT 随后评论称，未来 AI 可能成为社会生产力的核心基础设施，人与 AI 的绑定将越来越深。一旦科技公司封禁用户账号，就可能不仅仅是失去一项服务，而是直接剥夺其参与未来经济竞争的能力。因此，发展开源模型生态至关重要，它能够让用户保留自主选择权，避免被少数商业平台所控制。

我认同 @boneGPT 的观点，只是有一点担忧：未来最先进的 AI 模型可能仍然掌握在少数科技公司手中，闭源模型与开源生态之间甚至可能存在半年到一年的技术代差。如果这种差距长期存在，那么即使我们拥有本地部署和自主运行的能力，也可能不得不接受生产力上的落后。如何在保持技术自主权的同时，避免与最前沿的 AI 能力脱节，是一个值得思考的问题。